GUARDIAN – Hillsborough comments made by chief constable in email to be investigated

South Yorkshire police chief sent message to senior staff appearing to say families of those who died were not telling truth

Comments about the Hillsborough disaster made by a chief constable in an email will be investigated by another top police officer, a police and crime commissioner (PCC) has confirmed.

South Yorkshire PCC Shaun Wright said he has received a complaint regarding the content of emails sent by South Yorkshire chief David Crompton.

Crompton sent a message to his senior staff last year which appeared to suggest a campaign group representing families of those who died was not telling the full truth about the 1989 tragedy.

The email read: “One thing is certain – the Hillsborough Campaign for Justice will be doing their version … in fact their version of certain events has become ‘the truth’ even though it isn’t!!

“I just have the feeling that the media ‘machine’ favours the families and not us, so we need to be a bit more innovative in our response to have a fighting chance otherwise we will just be roadkill.”

Wright said the chief constable of Cambridgeshire, Simon Parr, will now investigate.

Crompton said he had thought the matter was “completely closed” after he apologised earlier this year.

The PCC said on Friday: “I have today recorded a complaint against the chief constable of South Yorkshire police, David Crompton, in relation to internal emails concerning the Hillsborough tragedy and its aftermath.

“The request has been submitted by a firm of solicitors in Liverpool acting on behalf of a number of individuals affected by the event. This is a formal complaint, which must be dealt with in accordance with statutory procedures.

“I have appointed an independent investigating officer, chief constable Simon Parr of Cambridgeshire Constabulary, to investigate the complaint.”

But Crompton said: “In February this year I apologised for the wording of an email.

“The Independent Police Complaints Commission looked into the matter at the request of the crime commissioner and publicly concluded that no formal disciplinary proceedings were justified.

“Nothing has changed since then. No new material is available now which was not available in February.

“I had understood the matter to be completely closed but will co-operate fully with any investigation if requested to do so.

“At this stage it would be inappropriate to comment any further.”

The internal email, which came to light following a Freedom of Information request, was sent as part of South Yorkshire police’s preparations for the publication of the Hillsborough Independent Panel report last year.

It discussed how the force could use its website to respond to the findings of the panel.

When the report was published, it provoked widespread condemnation of the force’s response to the disaster at Sheffield Wednesday’s ground in April 1989, which left 96 Liverpool fans dead.

It revealed how dozens of police statements had been altered to portray police in a better light.

South Yorkshire police’s response to the tragedy is currently subject to a huge inquiry by the IPCC.

In February, the IPCC commissioner, Nicholas Long, said the majority of the emails and documents he considered raised no issues.

But he said one email from the chief constable “caused me concern”.

He said: “I consider that this is at best ill-judged, and at worst offensive and upsetting.”


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

A news article on 2013-06-14 17:20:00 from: The Guardian

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

ESPN – Date set for new Hillsborough disaster inquests

New inquests into the deaths of the 96 Liverpool fans killed in the 1989 Hillsborough disaster will begin on March 31, 2014, the coroner has ruled.

A news article on 2013-06-05 23:02:00 from: ESPN

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

GUARDIAN – Branislav Ivanovic says he accepted biting apology from Luis Suárez

• Liverpool striker banned for 10 games over incident
• Ivanovic: ‘Afterwards I calmed down, all was forgotten’

Chelsea’s Branislav Ivanovic has confirmed he accepted an apology from Luis Suárez after the “really strange” biting incident last month at Anfield.

Suárez, Liverpool’s Uruguayan striker, was banned for 10 games by the Football Association following the incident, meaning he will miss the remainder of this season and the start of next.

“When it happened I was surprised and angry,” the Chelsea defender told the Serbian newspaper Vecernje Novosti. “But after the game I calmed down, and all was forgotten. We spoke on the phone, I accepted the apology, the police did not press charges.

“It was a really strange situation. Overnight I was everywhere because of what happened even though I was only a minor character [in the story]. For the first time in the news everything was about Ivanovic.”

Ivanovic said the Liverpool player could have few complaints about the length of his suspension.

“They took into account his past excesses and previous punishments. They added everything up and reached seven games, plus the three he would have had for being sent off.”


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

A news article on 2013-05-01 09:54:00 from: The Guardian

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

GUARDIAN – Hillsborough disaster police officers to refuse to give evidence to inquest

Lawyers say officers will exercise right not to answer questions to avoid incriminating themselves in criminal proceedings

Police officers on duty at Sheffield Wednesday’s Hillsborough football ground when 96 Liverpool supporters died in 1989 will refuse to give evidence to the new inquest into the disaster, their barristers have said at a pre-inquest hearing.

Lawyers for the three most senior surviving police officers in command that day, and the Police Federation representing lower ranked officers, said the inquest should be delayed for years until any possible criminal proceedings have been concluded. If held before that, Paul Greaney QC for the Police Federation said, officers under investigation for possible criminal misconduct would exercise their right not to answer questions, to avoid the risk of incriminating themselves.

“Many of those witnesses will be under investigation for possible offences, including homicide, and there is potential for them to be prosecuted,” Greaney said to the coroner, Lord Justice Goldring. “It is likely there will be an increased incidence of witnesses refusing to give evidence by invoking the privilege against self-incrimination.”

From the rows of bereaved Hillsborough family members in the large courtroom on High Holborn in London, there were audible gasps, and one said, quite loudly: “Outrageous.”

John Beggs QC, representing Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield, who was in command at Hillsborough, and the senior officers inside and outside the ground, Superintendents Roger Greenwood and Roger Marshall, supported Greaney’s call for the inquest to be delayed.

Goldring refused, however, and ruled the new inquest should start in early 2014.

He said that waiting for the criminal investigation, which was being led by Jon Stoddart, the former chief constable of Durham police, and then any prosecutions and appeals, could amount to a six-year delay. In his opening remarks, Goldring expressed sympathy for the families’ anguish and grief, and emphasised the need for the inquest to be held quickly, given that 24 years have already elapsed since the disaster. The original inquest with its verdict of accidental death was quashed in December after a long campaign against it by the families of the victims.

“I bear in mind that over that course of time some of the bereaved have died, most recently, of course, Anne Williams,” Goldring said. Williams, 62, who lost her 15-year-old son Kevin at Hillsborough, died last week. “Her death is a powerful reminder, if one were needed, that there is an urgency attaching to the commencement of the inquest hearings.”

Michael Mansfield QC, representing some of the families of the victims, pressed Goldring to appoint his own staff to handle the evidence for the inquest, saying the families had no faith in the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which is gathering the evidence on police conduct during and after the disaster, and with whom Stoddart is working closely. Goldring said he would consider that request.

Afterwards, Margaret Aspinall, chair of the Hillsborough Family Support Group, said if police officers were innocent of wrongdoing, they would give evidence.

“Why would you stay silent after 24 years?” she asked.

Goldring will decide next week the location for the new inquest, after the family groups disagreed about where they would prefer. Mansfield, representing the largest group, 71 families who are HFSG members, said their overwhelming majority view was for the inquest to be held in London. The principal reason, he said, was that London would be perceived as neutral in the bitterly contested history of Hillsborough, and there would be no possibility of “actual or perceived bias”.

However Pete Weatherby QC, representing 20 families, and lawyers for two other families, argued London was too far for mostly Liverpool-based family members to attend in full, and somewhere neutral in the north, such as Preston, should host it.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

A news article on 2013-04-25 17:54:00 from: The Guardian

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

F365 – New Hillsborough inquest date set for early next year

A new inquest into the deaths of 96 Liverpool fans at Hillsborough will take place in early 2014.

A news article on 2013-04-25 14:25:00 from: Football 365

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

GUARDIAN – Branislav Ivanovic rejects Luis Suárez’s apology for biting arm

• Chelsea defender ‘not happy at all’ with Liverpool striker
• Police officer checks Ivanovic’s arm for signs of injuries

Branislav Ivanovic has not accepted the apology from Luis Suárez over the biting incident and it has also emerged that the Metropolitan police asked to examine the Chelsea defender’s arm as part of an inquiry into the controversy.

Suárez, the Liverpool striker, who grabbed his opponent before biting his arm during the 2-2 draw at Anfield on Sunday, tweeted that he had spoken to Ivanovic on the phone to apologise. “Thanks for accepting,” the Uruguayan also wrote.

But it is understood that while Ivanovic appreciated the call, which was cordial, he stopped short of accepting the apology. Ivanovic’s team-mate Petr Cech said that the Serb was “not happy at all” and there remains an element of shock at Chelsea, even if they are determined not to become entangled in the fallout from the affair.

Cech was frustrated by what he felt was Suárez’s niggling approach and pushing of the boundaries. “I was not happy because he is always pushing people around to make space for himself,” the goalkeeper said. “This is what I was complaining to the referee about because he does it all the time, little fouls and pushes.”

Yet Chelsea seemed angrier about Suárez’s 97th-minute equaliser and not only because he ought not to have been on the pitch to score it. They accept that officials cannot see every incident clearly but the amount of injury time that was added vexed the interim manager Rafael Benítez and his players. The fourth official had signalled for a minimum of six minutes, with Suárez’s goal happening at six minutes and 34 seconds.

“The referee is on the pitch to decide how much extra time there is … it’s unusual to have six minutes,” Cech said. “I have to say that I have been a Chelsea player since 2004 and I have never had six minutes in my favour when I was losing. Obviously, you look at this and say: ‘Why does this happen when I play away?’ This is the referee’s choice, it’s his job to look for the extra time. We conceded in the last second and from our point, we have to do better next time.”

Ivanovic was checked over for injuries by Chelsea after the game – there were none – and the Met police officer who visited the club’s training ground also looked for bite marks or bruises. He too saw nothing. The officer, acting with the police on Merseyside, asked Ivanovic whether he wanted to press charges. He did not.

Chelsea have begun to look forward to Thursday’s Europa League semi-final first-leg at Basel. “We had a disappointing end at Liverpool but we have a massive game coming up,” Cech said. “We need to forget about this one and concentrate on the next.”

Mark Clattenburg will referee Chelsea’s match against Swansea on Sunday, his first involving the Blues since he was accused of using “inappropriate language” towards Mikel John Obi. Clattenburg was cleared by the Football Association.


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

A news article on 2013-04-22 21:30:00 from: The Guardian

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

F365 – FA confirms Suarez charge

The Football Association has charged Liverpool forward Luis Suarez with violent conduct for biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic.

A news article on 2013-04-22 16:59:00 from: Football 365

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

ECHO – Liverpool FC News: Luis Suarez fined for biting Branislav Ivanovic and donates money to Hillsborough campaign group

LIVERPOOL FC striker Luis Suarez has been fined by the club after biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanović – and has asked for the money to be donated to a Hillsborough campaign group.

A news article on 2013-04-22 09:44:00 from: Liverpool Echo

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

GUARDIAN – Luis Suárez’s Liverpool future in doubt despite apology for bite attack

• Uruguayan says sorry to Ivanovic after biting his arm
• ‘I am deeply sorry for my inexcusable behaviour’

Brendan Rodgers has told Luis Suárez that no player is irreplaceable after the Liverpool striker disgraced himself by sinking his teeth into Branislav Ivanovic during Chelsea’s 2-2 draw at Anfield.

The Uruguay forward’s Liverpool future is in doubt after he bit the Chelsea defender’s arm as the pair tussled for possession in front of the Kop goal. The referee, Kevin Friend, missed the incident and Suárez was able to remain on the pitch to score the 97th-minute equaliser that prevented Chelsea reclaiming third place in the Premier League. He is, however, expected to be charged by the Football Association and could receive a lengthy ban.

Suárez last night issued a grovelling apology to Ivanovic. “I am deeply sorry for my inexcusable behaviour earlier today during our match against Chelsea,” he said. “I have issued an apology and have tried to contact Branislav Ivanovic to speak to him personally. I apologise also to my manager, playing colleagues and everyone at Liverpool Football Club for letting them down.” Suárez later took to Twitter to say he had spoken directly to Ivanovic. “I’ve just spoken to Ivanovic on the phone and I could apologise directly to him. Thanks for accepting,” he wrote.

Ian Ayre, the Liverpool managing director, cancelled a scheduled four-day trip to the Far East and Australia, where he was going to promote the club’s pre-season tour, to deal with the latest controversy to befall the 26-year-old. Ayre had left Anfield prior to the bite to catch a flight to the Far East but returned to the club as soon as details of the incident were relayed.

“Luis has made an unreserved apology for his actions today,” he added in a statement. “His behaviour is not befitting of any player wearing a Liverpool shirt and Luis is aware that he has let himself and everyone associated with the club down. We will deal with the matter internally and await any action from the FA.”

Rodgers would not speak directly about the incident straight after the game but, having reviewed the footage, he later admitted that the striker’s behaviour was “unacceptable and I have made him aware of this”. Asked if he would sell Suárez in the event of his leading striker being found to have compromised those values and ethics, Rodgers replied: “It’s not for me to make any rash comments or any predictions now but, like I said, this is a football club where historically players treat people with how the football club respects society, players and everyone.

“I will review it and we will review it as a club. There is certainly no one bigger than this football club, as a player or a manager. As football managers, staff and players we’re representing this great football club off the field and particularly on the field. It’s just not the time to comment realistically on it now. I’ll review it with other people at the club and we’ll talk about it after.”

The Liverpool manager eventually conceded, however, that the club would not tolerate players who brought their reputation into disrepute. Rodgers added: “It doesn’t matter who, players are always replaceable no matter how good they think they are. That is how football works. Of course there are wonderful talents here we’ve seen at this club and others over many years. If you ever lose a player that you think you cannot replace, the next one still comes along. The standards at this football club have been met for many years and that’s why it is the worldwide institution that it is. The history of this club is about respect and how people are treated. And that is something that will always be maintained here and will always be long after I am gone.”

Ivanovic was reportedly spoken to by Surrey Police when the team arrived back at Chelsea’s Cobham training ground last night after complaints made to Merseyside Police were passed on to their southern colleagues, who wanted to ascertain whether the defender had sustained any injury. That was found not to be the case and Ivanovic told police he did not want to make a complaint.

Chelsea also now consider the matter closed but will co-operate with any FA investigation should it be necessary.

Rodgers has already disciplined Suárez once this season after the Liverpool striker admitted to diving in a vain attempt to win a penalty against Stoke City. The striker received a seven-match ban from the Dutch FA in 2010 for biting PSV Eindhoven’s Otman Bakkal while playing for Ajax and another lengthy suspension is likely to follow the Ivanovic incident from the Football Association.

“I will always speak openly and honestly and about the players and protect them when I can,” said Rodgers. “With all due respect I will make an honest appraisal of it. I will always defend people if I think they are right and tell them if I think they are wrong, as I have already this season with Luis. People have to accept it when they do wrong if that’s what the case is. They have to accept the consequences accordingly. It’s disappointing that we are not talking about the football because I think the character and personality they showed in the game was fantastic.”

Rodgers also claimed a first-half elbow from Fernando Torres on Jamie Carragher, that resulted in a yellow card for the Chelsea striker, was a major controversy from the game. He said: “No one mentions Fernando Torres’s elbow on Jamie Carragher in the first half. If we are talking about incidents in the game, then I think that is an incident. Jamie is a strong honest guy and he gets elbowed in the cheekbone quite clearly.”


guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

A news article on 2013-04-21 22:05:00 from: The Guardian

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.

ESPN – Reds owners join tributes to Hillsborough victims

Liverpool principal owner John W Henry and chairman Tom Werner will join those paying tribute to the victims of the Hillsborough disaster at Anfield on Monday.

A news article on 2013-04-15 10:11:00 from: ESPN

Read the full article here.

This news item has been reproduced from today’s media. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of Kop That.